New Hampshire Hears $100 Million Bitcoin Bonds Proposal.

Par
Publié le 8 July 2026

Regulation

The state of New Hampshire has taken another step forward in its ambitious Bitcoin bonds issuance project. A new public hearing was held to examine the proposal, which provides for a bond issuance of up to $100 million backed by bitcoin. This marks the second hearing cycle for this bill, reflecting the persistence and determination of local lawmakers to see this pioneering state-level initiative through.

While the federal debate over a potential strategic bitcoin reserve remains bogged down in a jurisdictional tug-of-war between agencies — the SEC, the CFTC, and the Treasury struggling to agree on the division of responsibilities — the states are taking the lead. New Hampshire is positioning itself as the pioneer of a movement that could well spread to other jurisdictions, inaugurating a veritable bitcoin race among American states.

Bitcoin price was hovering between $62,011 and $62,197 at the time of these hearings, while ether traded between $1,732 and $1,746. These price levels, in a relatively stable market, provided a favorable backdrop for examining this type of innovative financial instrument.

A project that persists where others have given up

What sets New Hampshire apart from other state-level bitcoin adoption attempts is the persistence of its legislators. Where several similar bills — in Arizona, Wyoming, and Texas — have failed or been significantly diluted over successive legislative sessions, New Hampshire Bitcoin bonds bill has survived two full hearing cycles.

This resilience is remarkable in the current American political landscape. Crypto assets remain a divisive subject, and opposition — both within political parties and from traditional financial regulators — is substantial. The fact that New Hampshire stays the course on this matter signals a deep conviction among its elected officials regarding bitcoin transformational potential for public finances.

The proposed mechanism is relatively simple in principle but complex in execution. The state would issue bonds — Bitcoin bonds — whose proceeds would be invested in acquiring bitcoin. Investors would purchase these bonds in the hope that bitcoin long-term appreciation would generate returns superior to those of traditional bonds, thereby creating an innovative funding source for the state infrastructure projects.

Details of the Bitcoin bonds mechanism

Concretely, the bill authorizes the New Hampshire State Treasury to issue bonds with a total value of up to $100 million, specifically for the purpose of acquiring bitcoin. These bonds would be repaid at maturity with interest, and the bitcoin thus acquired would constitute a reserve asset for the state.

Several implementation parameters are still being discussed during these hearings:

• The maturity period of the bonds, which could range from 5 to 20 years
• The interest rate offered to investors, which must be sufficiently attractive to ensure the success of the issuance
• The custody mechanisms for the acquired bitcoin, with enhanced security requirements
• The conditions under which the state could sell part of its reserve if liquidity is needed
• The accounting and tax framework applicable to this type of asset in public accounts

The hearings of this second cycle have helped refine these parameters. Several experts in public finance and crypto assets were heard, providing technical insights on the project feasibility. The debates notably focused on bitcoin volatility — a major risk for public finances — and on hedging strategies that could be implemented to limit the state exposure.

A striking contrast with the federal deadlock

New Hampshire initiative takes on its full meaning in the context of the regulatory impasse paralyzing federal institutions. The debate over creating a strategic bitcoin reserve — championed by some influential voices in the Senate and the House of Representatives — has become mired in a jurisdictional battle between the SEC, the CFTC, and the Treasury Department.

Each agency claims oversight rights over the management of a potential federal bitcoin reserve, with no consensus emerging on the division of responsibilities. The SEC insists on bitcoin security dimension and the need for strict supervision; the CFTC highlights its expertise in derivatives and commodities markets; the Treasury invokes considerations of financial stability and monetary policy.

This federal gridlock contrasts sharply with the agility shown by certain states like New Hampshire. In the absence of a clear federal framework, the states are becoming laboratories of financial innovation — a role they have historically played in the United States in areas as varied as corporate law, insurance, and banking regulation.

New Hampshire, pioneer of a state-level bitcoin arms race

If New Hampshire Bitcoin bonds project succeeds, it could trigger a domino effect across the United States. Several other states — including Texas, Wyoming, and Florida — have already shown signs of interest in similar mechanisms, even if none has yet advanced as far in the legislative process.

This dynamic could lead to a veritable bitcoin race among American states — a state-level bitcoin arms race — where each state would seek to position itself as the most welcoming and innovative in terms of bitcoin adoption. The stakes are multiple: attractiveness to crypto-sector businesses and talent, diversification of state financial reserves, and political positioning in an increasingly polarized partisan landscape.

For New Hampshire citizens and businesses, the potential benefits are significant. A successful Bitcoin bonds issuance would strengthen the state reputation as a financial innovation hub, attracting investors and entrepreneurs. It would also provide a means of funding infrastructure projects...