US Crypto Clarity Act Bill Faces 2-Week Deadline

Par DCN Editorial Team
Publié le 26 July 2026

Analysis

Clarity Act: The American Crypto Bill with 2 Weeks Until the Deadline — What You Need to Know

The countdown is on for the Clarity Act, the American bill aimed at regulating cryptocurrencies. With the Senate set to leave Washington in two weeks for the summer recess, negotiations around this text are intensifying. It could redefine the entire regulatory framework for digital assets in the United States. Between heavyweight backers (Goldman Sachs, Fidelity), an ethical tug-of-war, and a window of opportunity closing fast, the Clarity Act crystallizes all the stakes for the American crypto industry.

What is the Clarity Act?

The Clarity Act (Digital Asset Regulatory Clarity Act) is the most ambitious legislative text ever presented to the U.S. Congress concerning cryptocurrency regulation. Primarily championed by Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis (Wyoming), a fervent Bitcoin advocate, and Senator Tim Scott (South Carolina), Chairman of the Banking Committee, the bill aims to create a comprehensive federal framework for crypto-asset markets.

The text covers several fundamental aspects:

• Classification of digital assets: Determining what falls under the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) versus the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission), a clarification the industry has awaited for years.
• Stablecoins: A framework for dollar-backed stablecoins, including controversial provisions regarding the payment of interest.
• Centralized exchanges: Rules for licensing and consumer protection.
• Decentralized Finance (DeFi): Protection for developers of non-custodial software, who would not be considered financial intermediaries.
• Ethical clauses: For the first time, a provision prohibiting high-ranking government officials (including the president) and their spouses from issuing digital assets.

2 Weeks to Change Everything: The Timeline

The U.S. Senate leaves Washington for the summer recess (August recess) in two weeks, around August 9-10, 2026. Before this deadline, the Clarity Act must clear several critical stages:

• A procedural vote (cloture): Requiring 60 votes in the Senate to limit debate and avoid a filibuster.
• A final Senate vote: Simple majority.
• Negotiations with the House of Representatives: Where a different version (the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act — FIT21) was already passed earlier in 2026.
• Presidential signature: President Donald Trump has not yet officially taken a position on the final text.

According to information from CoinDesk, senators recently published a new text merging two competing versions of the bill, addressing the issue of ethical provisions for the first time. A significant step forward, but it might not be enough.

Goldman Sachs and Fidelity: Wall Street Rallies

The most resounding support came from David Solomon, CEO of Goldman Sachs, who publicly backed the Clarity Act in a rare intervention. Solomon thus distinguished himself from Jamie Dimon (JP Morgan Chase) and traditional banking groups, who warn against the text’s provisions on paying interest on stablecoins. According to the latter, this measure risks diverting deposits from traditional banks to stablecoin issuers, disintermediating the banking system — an argument reminiscent of debates surrounding money market funds.

Fidelity Investments, the asset management giant ($4.5 trillion under management), has also joined the coalition supporting the text. The company, which already offers Bitcoin trading and custody services to its institutional clients, sees the Clarity Act as an indispensable condition for deploying more ambitious products — notably ETFs on assets other than Bitcoin and Ethereum, currently held back by regulatory uncertainty.

“The Clarity Act is the missing piece of the puzzle for Wall Street to massively adopt crypto. Without a clear framework, institutions remain on the sidelines.”

— David Solomon, CEO of Goldman Sachs (July 2026)

The Ethical Clause: The Sticking Point

The most controversial provision of the new text is undoubtedly the ethical clause, aimed at preventing conflicts of interest at the highest levels of government. According to revelations from Decrypt, the latest version of the Clarity Act prohibits the president, members of Congress, and their spouses from issuing or launching digital assets. A measure that seems tailor-made for President Donald Trump, whose family has launched several crypto projects (including World Liberty Financial, a DeFi protocol).

However, this prohibition is not eternal: it expires in 2029, at the end of the current presidential term. Furthermore, enforcement of this clause rests solely with the Department of Justice (DOJ), without an independent oversight mechanism — which Democrats consider insufficient.

Democratic senators, led by Elizabeth Warren (Massachusetts) and Sherrod Brown (Ohio, Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee until January 2027), reject these ethical provisions, deeming them “cosmetic.” They demand an independent oversight body and automatic sanctions in case of violations, rather than a simple delegation to the DOJ.

The Clarity Act on a Tightrope

Despite these advances, the window for passage is narrowing dangerously. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (Republican, South Dakota) has suggested that the text might not clear the hurdle before the summer recess, according to information reported by Decrypt on July 24. Political analysts have revised their passage probabilities downward, estimating that a successful vote before the August recess is no longer guaranteed.

The reasons for this pessimism are multiple:

• Time: Two weeks is very short for a text of this magnitude in the U.S. Senate, where each procedural step can take several days.
• Divergence with the House: FIT21, passed by the House in 2025-2026, differs from the Clarity Act on several points. A conference committee would be necessary, adding weeks to the process.
• Democratic opposition: Republicans control the Senate (53 seats), but there is no guarantee they will secure the 7 Democratic votes needed to reach the 60-vote threshold for cloture.
• The electoral deadline: With the November 2026 midterm elections looming, each party seeks to score political points, making compromises more difficult.

What Happens if the Clarity Act Fails?

If the Senate cannot vote on the Clarity Act before the summer recess, the text could be postponed to the fall. But several unknowns loom:

• The post-recess calendar: Between September and November, the Senate will be consumed by the federal budget and judicial nominations, leaving little room for a complex piece of legislation.
• The midterm elections: After November 2026, the composition of Congress could change, potentially forcing a restart if the text is not adopted.
• Regulatory uncertainty persists: In the absence of a law, the SEC and CFTC would continue their jurisdictional war, with a “regulation by enforcement” approach that the industry denounces.
• An exodus of companies: Without a clear framework, several American crypto players are considering relocating their activities to more welcoming jurisdictions (Hong Kong, Singapore, Europe — where MiCA has already been in effect since 2025).

The Macroeconomic and Geopolitical Context

The fate of the Clarity Act unfolds against a backdrop of a persistent bear market for cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin is hovering around $65,000, its lowest level in months, in an environment of monetary tightening where the Fed maintains high interest rates around 5.25-5.50%. The DXY index (dollar) remains strong, compressing risky assets, and flows into spot Bitcoin ETFs — after a promising start to 2026 with record inflows in January and February — have considerably dried up since the spring.

The adoption of a clear regulatory framework is seen by many institutional investors as an indispensable prerequisite for a genuine rally. Bitwise, the crypto asset manager, estimates that “Wall Street will migrate on-chain,” but only once the rules of the game are clarified. The Clarity Act is therefore, to a certain extent, a more important catalyst for the market than the Fed’s next decision on interest rates.

Regulatory uncertainty largely explains why ETF flows are sluggish: financial advisors and family offices are waiting for more clarity before allocating significant amounts to this asset class, which remains poorly defined legally. An adopted Clarity Act would radically change this dynamic, potentially triggering a...